So taking out "-w" would give me the 1x1 pixel? It's not that I missed that, I read it, I must have just read it wrong. The way I understood it, if I took out "-w" THEN it would give me the 30x30 warning picture, which I didn't want so I didn't change the script.
I'll have another wack at it.
BTW, why would it overlay the warning graphic on youtube (and other site's) videos and yet still play them underneath? I thought the whole point of the pixel was to take the place of an advertisement, not just overlay it. Just seems like it defeats the purpose. Obviously I'm missing something. I'm known to do that. :-/
Thanks again,
LJ
<EDIT>
Ok, found the mixup:
From your documentation (00-README-adblock.txt):
By default, pixelserv will serve up a 1x1 blank pixel. For testing
purposes, you can have it serve up a 30x30 [y]ellow warning picture.
From the script itself (50-start_adblock.autorun):
# The pixelserv "-w" option replaces the ads with a 30x30 warning logo,
# for testing.
# Without "-w" it replaces ads with a 1x1 empty pixel.
The documentation says that by default the script is set to use the 1x1 pixel. That's how I missed it. I didn't change the script so expected the 1x1 to be in effect. In fact, the 30x30 "-w" flag is included by default in the script.
*shrugs*
Now, am I understanding this correctly - that if I change the script to remove "-w" and start using the 1x1 pixel instead of the 30x30 warning sign (thereby taking it out of "testing" mode) it will replace the ads intead of overlaying them? And by extension, will this start blanking out youtube videos? So confused … LOL
LJ